Subject: Re: [boost] safe-bool CRTP class
From: Christopher Jefferson (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-28 10:49:54
On 28 May 2011, at 14:22, Krzysztof Czainski wrote:
> Thank you all for such large input ;-)
> So the way I see it, most of us agree it would be nice to see one official
> safe-bool implementation tool in boost.
> The first question is: should it be a CRTP class, or should it be a macro,
> or both perhaps?
I think we should go macro.
I wonder if the macro should take a parameter, just to give some way of getting a unique name. We could of course use some random integer / line number / file name, but such things are likely to be fragile and code could easily end up breaking the "one definition rule".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk