Subject: Re: [boost] safe-bool CRTP class
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-05-29 08:07:22
On 28.05.2011, at 22:31, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. <
> jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Here's a trial attempt at an implementation of the macro (warning: not
> I haven't looked at the implementation in depth, but if I recall correctly,
> C++0x explicit conversions to bool are not quite the same as a safe-bool
> conversion (explicit conversions still generally require explicit casts,
> correct me if I'm wrong).
True. You can only omit the case in "contextual conversion" situations, which are:
- Conditions of if, while, do..while and for (maybe switch? not sure).
- Arguments to &&, || and !.
- First argument to ?:.
So these two code examples that a 03 user might write would fail:
bool b = obj; // must write bool b(obj);
fn(obj); // must cast
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk