Re: [boost] [review] Heaps

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Heaps
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-02 04:24:43

> >> One of my primary objections to the current design is the use of
> >> unspecified policy parameters in the template parameter list of the
> >> main data structures. I think that it is important to limit the number
> >> of top-level template parameters to only non-policy parameters.
> > 
> > of course this can be discussed ... i somehow like this explicit way of
> > specifying parameters, but this is probably my personal preference ...
> 
> But they're not explicit; the parameters are entirely too vague. If I
> look at the class definition, I should be able to able to generate
> some reasonable hypothesis about the kinds of types accepted by the
> template parameters.

hm ... i have modeled the interface vaguely according to boost.intrusive 
(probably because i was using it extensively in the months before working on 
boost.heap).

tim