Re: [boost] [contract] syntax redesign

Subject: Re: [boost] [contract] syntax redesign
From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-02 14:07:06

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Not using a comma as a replacement for = when specifying defaults may
> happen too.
>

Actually, I just realized that (,) is not even an option, so there goes
that. Unless you can come up with something other than , that
BOOST_GENERIC_ASSIGN would expand out to, I think I'm going to stick with
comma.

Maybe two commas :/

-- 
-Matt Calabrese