Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost interested in the Boost-based Base64 library
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-10 12:35:55
Mathias Gaunard wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 01:14, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> I think you'd find it interesting to see how the serialization
>> library does it.
> The code of these is much more complicated than it needs to be; there
> is too much coupling between the algorithm and the iterator adaptor.
well, it's implemented in terms of iterator adaptor. I see that as a
This gives maximal efficiency and total compile time flexibility and
leverages on working/tested/reviewed code - which to me is
what boost is about.
I can't see how another implementation which doesn't use
the already made stuff can be faster or more efficient or
add less code to the code base.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk