Re: [boost] clang type traits

Subject: Re: [boost] clang type traits
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-12 07:27:24

On 10 June 2011 18:13, Doug Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> For Clang feature tests, please use __has_feature (or the newer
> __has_extension) rather than peeking at Clang version numbers.
> __has_feature/__has_extension are language-dialect aware and represent
> what the compiler actually supports, while Clang version numbers can
> vary widely from one vendor to another (e.g., Apple's version numbers
> for its Clang-based compilers are distinct from the LLVM project's
> version numbers for Clang).

Can we distinguish between Apple's versions and LLVM's versions?