Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] Qualification of 'at' and 'deref' in fusion (Ticket #4755)
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-15 07:55:38
On 15/06/2011 00:09, Vicente Botet wrote:
> If the headers qualify any symbol, the preceding is not ambiguous. Of
> course, the user needs to be aware that there is a potential conflict for at
> and deref, and should also use qualification to avoid the conflicts.
> I'm missing something?
The bug is that the fusion headers do not qualify the calls.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk