Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] [heap] Summary
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-20 15:11:19


Den 20-06-2011 20:56, Andrew Sutton skrev:
>> This is of course not a very large foundation on which to make such a
>> decision. Nor is the vote particular clear.
>>
>> I didn't cast a vote, but I will be /extremely/ unhappy with having
>> a library where this is not addressed:

>> So /please/ add this to the list of required fixes that must be done before
>> inclusion is possible.
>
> No, I will not add this to the list of requirements. I considered this
> suggestion very carefully when writing my evaluation and again when
> preparing the summary and ultimately decided that trying to shoehorn
> this requirement into the existing framework was not the best approach
> for providing the feature. Phil's suggestion of implementing heap
> algorithms on ranges lends itself to a more natural solution to this
> requirement.

How is this going to work? Do we have example of how my code will look
like then?

-Thorsten


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk