|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in command line interpreter class templates?
From: Joshua Boyce (raptorfactor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-20 22:02:46
One of the primary reasons that I (and others) avoid Boost.ProgramOptions is
that it doesn't 'natively' support wide strings (wide strings are simply
static_cast to narrow strings with no regard to localization or
internationalization). How does this library compare in that respect?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk