Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Schedule discussion
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-26 05:57:09


On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 22:18, Lars Viklund <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> If I saw a bump of Boost to 2.x.0, I would expect that something massive
> and somewhat breaking has occurred, along the lines of:
> * complete build system revamp, with different build methods and library
> naming convention;
> * modularisation of boost libraries into largely standalone components,
> with some infrastructure to roll monolithic and custom releases;
> * in essence - Ryppl and the Boost.CMake effort.

I always thought that update of all or most of libraries to take account of
some important C++0x features (like adding move semantics where apropriate)
would have it's part in bumping boost to 2.x . Or something related to

Joël Lamotte

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at