Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Type Traits Introspection library by Edward Diener starts tomorrow Friday 1
From: Joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-03 10:18:18
On 03/07/11 07:21, Edward Diener wrote:
> You have made a very good point.
> My intention, evidently misguided, was to put the generated
> metafunctions in the boost::tti namespace to avoid polluting the global
> namespace. But I see now that I should not have added a namespace at all
> and the end-user could then use the macros in whatever namespace he
> wants in order to avoid ODR violations, and/or just use the complicated
> macro form to create a unique name for the metafunction. Actually, of
> course, that still could be done, but a full metafuncion name of
> 'anamespace::boost::tti::has_type_mytype' is more gruesome than
> Thanks for pointing this out.
When i developed the very similar code that you have now, I purposely
made the macro not generate namespace around. I think that is
what BOOST_MPL_HAS_XXX does anyway. Let the user call the macro in the
namespace of its choice.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk