Subject: Re: [boost] [type traits extension] test for const volatile& as returntype
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-06 05:37:45
>g++ is just fine for what I want to do but intel issues an error if T
>is "const volatile&" so that the program cannot compile and the g(...)
>is not chosen. Does anybody understands if this is the right behaviour
>according to the standard or if g++ is right chosing g(...)?
No idea, but if you have a test case I'm able to file bug reports to Intel.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk