Re: [boost] [TTI] Review

Subject: Re: [boost] [TTI] Review
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-12 19:27:51

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 7/12/2011 5:45 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Edward
>> Diener<eldiener_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>> [...]
>>> TTI_TEMPLATE(yyy,(3,(class,**int,template<class,class>))) // (3) both
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Isn't the above a size 4 Boost.PP Array?  Or are you purposely
>> demonstrating
>> the ease with which the user would make mistakes with this syntax? :)
>
> You copied it wrong from my reply. Are you purposely demonstrating the ease
> by which template parameters may be copied incorrectly <g> ?

Sorry... I really don't understand what this means...

> You are right that it should be:
>
> TTI_TEMPLATE(yyy,(4,(class,int,template<class,class>))) // (3) both
>
> Despite my error in counting commas ( or addding 1 to my count ), I prefer
> this syntax rather than inventing a different one. I realized that it is
> easier presenting a pp-array than a pp-seq, as long as one can simply count
> commas ( unlike yours truly ).

How may commas do you count for the following case? Warning: It's a
trick question ;)

TTI_TEMPLATE(t, (?, (typename R, typename A0, typename A1, R (fptr)(A0, A1))))

--Lorenzo