Subject: Re: [boost] [infrastructure] The vault vs. project hosting vs. Boost hosting?
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-17 08:50:29
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 14:36, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It would be good to know what those additional tools/features are. And more
> apt, if they are things that authors would want or need.
I cannot help on this side as I'm mostly using GHC, but I think there are
github power-users in the boost community who would love to help.
> 2. GCH provide Subversion and Mercurial repositories while GitHub
>> Git only repositories.
> Correction; GCH provides Subversion, Mercurial, and Git <
That's news to me! Itwasn't the case when I setup my projects few months
ago, thanks for pointing it.
> Although that gives a similar result to the traditional vault, it has one
> significant drawback. It introduces a management layer for Boost for each
> proposed library/file. This is worse than both the old vault
> (self-registration) and sandbox (one-time moderator registration).
I don't understand what "management layer" you are talking about exactly? I
was thinking like just a few scripts that regularly pull repositories
changes would make the "management" automatic.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk