Subject: Re: [boost] [tti] review
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-17 16:22:22
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Gordon Woodhull <gordon_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> I agree with Jeff's suggestion that the matching metafunction should take a
> metafunction that defaults to is_same rather than always testing for type
> equality (and now I see why he was also suggesting that in the Type Traits
> Extension review :).
Well, at least I convinced someone...eventually :) Maybe I should give
another shoutout to Frederic to reconsider this!
[also, small correction, it should default to boost::mpl::always<
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk