Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-users] [Review] Lockfree review starts today, July 18th
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-20 14:04:29
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 18:51, Tim Blechmann <tim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> If Boost.Lockfree will be accepted, it won't be merged into trunk before
> >> Boost.Atomic is accepted.
> > That seems unnecessary. Can't Boost.Lockfree simply include (a version
> > of) Boost.Atomic as an implementation detail for now?
> this would somehow mean to fork boost.atomic, move everying to a `namespace
> detail'. might introduce some maintenance overhead to keep it in sync with
> original library.
Excuse me if it's common knowledge around here, but I've seen several
libraries relying on boost.atomic that have been reviewed,
so may I ask : why haven't Boost.Atomic been reviewed yet? It looks like
it's already finished and reliable...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk