Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [C++0x] Emulate C++0x char16_t, char32_t, std::u16string, and std::u32string
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-22 05:03:39

On 07/22/2011 04:13 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:

> Right, instead you have to write BOOST_CHAR16_T, which is defined as
> boost::char16_t or char16_t depending on availability of C++0x or
> Microsoft char16_t. Ugly. Ugly. Ugly.

Or, as I said, you use boost::char16, which is a typedef to char16_t if

No macro, no ugliness, portable and safe.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at