Subject: Re: [boost] [infrastructure] The vault vs. project hosting vs. Boost hosting?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-21 22:16:07
[Somehow forgot to send this to the list, I guess]
on Sun Jul 17 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, the idea of spending some money (which we've earned through
>> BoostCon) on our own host is one of the items on the steering
>> committee's agenda.
>>> There are likely others, but those are the ones I'm aware of at the
>>> moment. Even though I appreciate the hard work it takes to host
>>> something like Boost. It seems that we can be better served through
>>> some other hosting. I recently found another university providing the
>>> same kind of hosting services we currently get. But in this case
>>> hosting is what they do, as opposed to something they happen do on the
>>> side. They are the Oregon State University Open Source Lab
>>> <http://osuosl.org/>. And they host a rather distinguished list of OSS
>>> projects <http://osuosl.org/services/hosting/communities> like:
>>> Apache, Debian, Drupal, Eclipse, Fedora, RPM, Slackware, and more. To
>>> me it's looking more and more that our requirements for hosting are
>>> increasing rather than stabilizing. And hence it makes sense to move
>>> to a provider than can scale, instead of sticking with one that needs
>>> to cut back.
>> Whoa, definitely. Is that something we can get for free?
> Just looked into this a bit myself.
> http://osuosl.org/services/hosting/details sounds *awesome*. I'm going
> to inquire as to whether they would host us. Can't hurt to ask!
Well, the response was very positive, and they have resources for build
slaves. They've asked us for a few pieces of information:
* Will we need them to host our SVN in the near term?
I think we should say yes.
* What is our estimated bandwidth usage?
I'm not sure how to find out. DongInn, do you have that information?
I guess a significant part of our bandwidth needs are being handled by
SourceForge. I can see some information, e.g. at
but I'm a bit at a loss concerning how to turn that into an aggregate
* "In general how much disk space and RAM do we think we'll need?"
I know, this is a tough one. I think it might be possible to come up
with a number that doesn't include a projection for build slaves. But
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk