Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Lockfree review] Meta-comments
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-25 15:40:25

on Sun Jul 24 2011, "Phil Endecott" <> wrote:

> If Tim did that then we would need to review it now, right?

Only its implementation, not its interface or documentation.

> (For correctness, anyway. Not necessarily for its interface. But
> that doesn't make much difference in practice, since the interface is
> supposed to be the std:: one.)


Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at