Subject: Re: [boost] [Lockfree review] Meta-comments
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-25 15:40:25
on Sun Jul 24 2011, "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_boost_dev-AT-chezphil.org> wrote:
> If Tim did that then we would need to review it now, right?
Only its implementation, not its interface or documentation.
> (For correctness, anyway. Not necessarily for its interface. But
> that doesn't make much difference in practice, since the interface is
> supposed to be the std:: one.)
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk