Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] shared_ptr<>: why no operator[] ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: dgwsoft (gareth_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-27 05:54:41

Next message: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [context] MinGW support?"
Previous message: Levy, Gabriel (Contractor): "Re: [boost] shared_ptr<>: why no operator[] ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]"
In reply to: Levy, Gabriel (Contractor): "Re: [boost] shared_ptr<>: why no operator[] ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]"

yes of course, Julien and Gaby you are right, I was misreading it. Confusion
with std::vector<int> p(42), I think.

cheers

Gareth

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/shared-ptr-why-no-operator-tp3697208p3698013.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [context] MinGW support?"
Previous message: Levy, Gabriel (Contractor): "Re: [boost] shared_ptr<>: why no operator[] ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]"
In reply to: Levy, Gabriel (Contractor): "Re: [boost] shared_ptr<>: why no operator[] ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk