Re: [boost] [Review] TTI

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] TTI
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-29 14:39:57

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>wrote:
[...]

> Not necessarily. In TTI I currently use Boost function types to synthesize
> a notation of a member function with a return type and an unlimited number
> of parameters into what I need, and I may be able to do a similar thing with
> your code. Of course I am not saying I can't use macros also when I need it.
>

The (big) difference here is that you need to construct a member function
call *expression* (which necessarily requires the name of the member
function), not a member function *type*...indeed, you can't even know the
signature of the member function you want to call, since you're relying on
the compiler to determine the right one based on overload resolution.

- Jeff