Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] TTI
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-29 14:39:57
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Not necessarily. In TTI I currently use Boost function types to synthesize
> a notation of a member function with a return type and an unlimited number
> of parameters into what I need, and I may be able to do a similar thing with
> your code. Of course I am not saying I can't use macros also when I need it.
The (big) difference here is that you need to construct a member function
call *expression* (which necessarily requires the name of the member
function), not a member function *type*...indeed, you can't even know the
signature of the member function you want to call, since you're relying on
the compiler to determine the right one based on overload resolution.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk