Subject: Re: [boost] [lockfree] review
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-30 08:40:44
on Fri Jul 29 2011, Gordon Woodhull <gordon-AT-woodhull.com> wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2011, at 7:36 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Personally I never understood how sequential consistency could be much
>> of a help in reasoning about multithreaded programs... but that's just
> True, it's bad enough with sequential consistency, but without it
> there's no hope of understanding at all IMO.
I think I meant the opposite, or nearly so. How does not having
sequential consistency make reasoning worse?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk