Re: [boost] enable_if and non-template member functions?

Subject: Re: [boost] enable_if and non-template member functions?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-06 06:43:05

On 08/06/2011 10:38 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> Folks, I have a problem with enable_if: it works just dandy for template
> member functions in my class, but I have some *non-template* member
> functions and constructors that I want to enable only if the template is
> instantiated with template args that meet certain criteria. Seems like I
> can't do this with enable_if as it then generates an invalid class
> definition. I guess I could use base classes, and/or partial
> specialization, but both involve a lot of code duplication I'd rather
> not have. Anyone any ideas?

Make a member function that forwards to a free template function?