Re: [boost] [move] [variant] Some problems with VC++10

Subject: Re: [boost] [move] [variant] Some problems with VC++10
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-08 14:35:27

On 08/08/2011 18:54, Antony Polukhin wrote:

> Most generic way to get rid of such ambiguity, is to import std::move
> in namespace boost (if we have std::move).

Or to get MSVC to qualify std::move.

I agree it might still be a good idea to reuse std::move if it's 
available. The problem is that we've got no configuration macro for this.
Some compilers have rvalue references but may not have a standard 
library that contains std::move.