Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [move] Pathscale and Sun
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-09 17:10:11


On 7 August 2011 20:34, <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Last time I checked Sun C++ was not conforming enough, if you can test it
> for me it would be nice since I have no access to the compiler. Or is there
> a free evalution version to check the compiler?

I don't have access to it either. I just removed the used the
preprocessor to remove the use of BOOST_RV_REF, and that seems to have
worked okay. I might use some template metastuff instead, so that
something like boost::unordered_set<int> can be explicitly
instantiated.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk