Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [proto] Problems with operator <<
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-25 10:19:39

Next message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] painless currying"
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [type traits] Extension to operator detection -> choose your preferred naming"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [proto] Problems with operator <<"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [proto] Problems with operator <<"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [proto] Problems with operator <<"

On 8/25/2011 4:08 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> To answer my own question - in case anyone else gets bitten by this -
> the answer is you need to provide overloads with both const and
> non-const reference RHS arguments to effectively hide the proto operator
> versions.
>
> Still some hair left yours.... John.

Why answer you own question when I answered it for you yesterday?

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/222816

And I think you have a reason to actual disable proto's operators
instead of just hide them. Check the msg I sent yesterday.

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Next message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] painless currying"
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [type traits] Extension to operator detection -> choose your preferred naming"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [proto] Problems with operator <<"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [proto] Problems with operator <<"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [proto] Problems with operator <<"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk