Re: [boost] [review] conversion - Vladimir's comments

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] conversion - Vladimir's comments
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-30 14:33:53

On 30/08/2011 19:38, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

> Right. This doesn't mean that you can not use the library with
> specializations that don't conflict. Some useful examples are given for
> some Boost and STL classes. The idea is that the source and target
> specialization are enough concrete to avoid the conflict. If you have an
> example of partial specialization that will conflict I could try to see
> how I would do it.

Let's say I do a fusion sequence to string converter.
Then I do a proto expression to string converter.

(Proto expressions are also fusion sequences)

> No problem. I will use Boost.Dispatch if it responds to my needs. BTW,
> where can I get the Boost.Dispatch documentation?

Not done yet.
It's still in development and a bit rough around the edges.