Re: [boost] Name and Namespace for Potential Boost Extended Floating-Point

Subject: Re: [boost] Name and Namespace for Potential Boost Extended Floating-Point
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-30 16:19:21

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Christopher Kormanyos
<e_float_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> From: Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
>
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] Name and Namespace for Potential Boost Extended
> Floating-Point
>
> I'm against mp.  It's too close to mpl.
>
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
>
> We also found "mp" to be too terse and non-intuitive.
> Thank you. You're right. It is too close to mpl.
>

It's too close to mpi too... :)

- Jeff