Re: [boost] [optional] Thoughts on disallowing assignment for wrapped references.

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Thoughts on disallowing assignment for wrapped references.
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-02 14:10:01

Mostafa wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:13:30 -0700, Nevin Liber
> <nevin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > On 31 August 2011 16:13, Mostafa
> > <mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Ahh, I disagree with that.  IMO, if maybereff was not bound at
> construction time, then it should always remain
> "uninitialized".

If the only way to make a non-empty optional<T&> is to construct it from a reference, then it couldn't be used, for example, as a function return type.

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

________________________________

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.