Subject: Re: [boost] [conversion] review
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-03 05:41:22
Le 02/09/11 19:41, Gordon Woodhull a écrit :
> I still find a syntax that emphasizes types over function names preferable, even if it involves a lot of angle brackets and ::'s. But I guess there's no disputing tastes, and we also saw a couple of technical problems with the approach taken in Boost.Conversion.
> Thanks everyone for participating.
Thanks to you also for your active participation,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk