Subject: Re: [boost] [any] new version
From: Mika Heiskanen (mika.heiskanen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-05 15:21:25
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 21:17 +0300, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Mon Sep 05 2011, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard-AT-ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> > The C++11 standard (the only one aware of multithreading) mandates
> > that initialization of static variables at function scope is
> > thread-safe.
> Really? I didn't pay attention to ever twist or turn of the process of
> standardizing multithreading, but it greatly surprises me to hear that,
> because it would impose an overhead on those function-static variables
> that don't need synchronization. Can you cite the paragraphs that give
> this guarantee?
In this draft version
the relevant paragraph seems to be 6.7.4.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk