Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Performance
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-06 07:57:21
> I have conducted a small and non-representative benchmark,
> the ugly source code of which I have uploaded here:
> It compares several versions of code meant to "bswap"
> 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit integer values.
Could you post the important bits of your byte_swapper::reverse() to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk