Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Performance
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-07 04:49:37
On 09/07/2011 01:54 AM, Phil Endecott wrote:
> Unfortunately not, no; in my tests the gcc built-ins were the
> worse-performing on one platform.
Then it's a bug that should be fixed in the compiler.
(But then it could also be that your benchmark is imperfect)
>> I don't think this is really important though.
> You mean the performance of these endian operations in general is not
Not that much no. It's important that it's reasonably fast, but it
needn't be performance critical.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk