Subject: Re: [boost] [any] new version
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-08 09:51:29
On 06/09/2011 19:41, Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> As you obviously didn't answer the question, you seem to be unable to cite the paragraphs at the moment.
I didn't give the citation because it was already given in another
I was just reacting to part of his comment, I guess I didn't quote very
I do not find this decision that the standard took surprising; it seems
like the natural and logical choice. It requires overhead, but it's the
only way to make it work with re-entrant functions, which is the most
basic guarantee all multi-threaded functions should fulfill.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk