Subject: Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-10 15:23:32
On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Does this respond to your expectations?
> My first proposal of Boost.Chrono included Stopwatches, but some on this list sugested that i would be better to split the library :(
That design still has merit, but -
> If no body is agains I will move Boost.Stopwatches to the namespace boost::chrono, remove the reporting facilities, and find a date for a review.
My point was that since you own Chrono you can add whatever you want to it. So you could get something distributed now and see about a review later.
But perhaps I'm the only one thinking the need for a Boost.Timer replacement is urgent.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk