Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library

Subject: Re: [boost] [stopwatches] About reducing the scope of the library
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-10 15:23:32

On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

> Does this respond to your expectations?

Yes!

> My first proposal of Boost.Chrono included Stopwatches, but some on this list sugested that i would be better to split the library :(

That design still has merit, but -

> If no body is agains I will move Boost.Stopwatches to the namespace boost::chrono, remove the reporting facilities, and find a date for a review.

My point was that since you own Chrono you can add whatever you want to it.  So you could get something distributed now and see about a review later.

But perhaps I'm the only one thinking the need for a Boost.Timer replacement is urgent.

Cheers,
Gordon