Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [proto] Looong compile times and other issues
From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-14 12:32:57

Next message: Marsh Ray: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in unit testing both passing and failing BOOST_MPL_ASSERTs?"
Previous message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [utility] rvalue support in value_initialized"
In reply to: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [proto] Looong compile times and other issues"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [proto] Looong compile times and other issues"

Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:

> A complete rewrite using decltype, rvalue refs and variadic templates
> would GREATLY improve things. That's probably true for both Fusion and
> Proto.

Speaking as a proto user working with a rather large grammar, this would
be most welcome. :)

-Dave

Next message: Marsh Ray: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in unit testing both passing and failing BOOST_MPL_ASSERTs?"
Previous message: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [utility] rvalue support in value_initialized"
In reply to: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [proto] Looong compile times and other issues"
Next in thread: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [proto] Looong compile times and other issues"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk