Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in unit testing both passing and failing BOOST_MPL_ASSERTs?
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-15 18:30:07
On Sep 15, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Gordon Woodhull <gordon <at> woodhull.com> writes:
>> It also sounds like it's for more than just testing.
> What else can you use this for?
That's what I'd use it for, but Ben is talking about assertions that double as tests, so they'd go into the code proper and have different behavior in test mode.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk