Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in unit testing both passing and failing BOOST_MPL_ASSERTs?
From: Ben Robinson (icaretaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-16 03:21:33
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Okay, point taken. But that's *not* BOOST_MPL_ASSERT. IMO you need a
> different macro for that purpose.
> I agree. I will be creating new macros for my purposes. They will likely
conditionally forward to the BOOST_MPL_ASSERT_* macros, since they produce
the most informative output when a compile error is desired.
Ben Robinson, Ph.D.
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk