Re: [boost] Is there interest in unit testing both passing and failing BOOST_MPL_ASSERTs?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in unit testing both passing and failing BOOST_MPL_ASSERTs?
From: Ben Robinson (icaretaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-16 03:21:33

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> Okay, point taken.  But that's *not* BOOST_MPL_ASSERT.  IMO you need a
> different macro for that purpose.
>
> I agree.  I will be creating new macros for my purposes.  They will likely
conditionally forward to the BOOST_MPL_ASSERT_* macros, since they produce
the most informative output when a compile error is desired.

Thank you,

Ben Robinson, Ph.D.

> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>