Subject: Re: [boost] [any] new version
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-16 08:44:16
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> "Stewart, Robert" wrote:
> > Running the standards organizations is not without costs.
> > Charging for their output is a means to cover those costs.
> How come that ALL of ECMA standards (and technical reports)
> are available for downloading free of charge?
I have no certain idea. I think that the ECMA standardization process is less rigid, so that probably helps. However, the costs must be covered somehow. There are, no doubt, different models for doing so. I was just noting that there are costs and that charging for products is a means to cover those costs. I was not suggesting that there weren't other or possibly better ways.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk