Subject: Re: [boost] Persistency library
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-24 18:39:56
On 9/24/2011 10:31 AM, Lifshitz, Yair wrote:
> Object-based persistency/serialization libraries often require significant modifications to the code.
> Would Boost consider adding a process-level checkpointing library to boost?
Why not explain what you mean by a "process-level checkpointing library"
and then others can comment if they might find it useful ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk