Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Persistency library
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-25 16:53:12


Am 25.09.2011 22:18, schrieb Lifshitz, Yair:
> From: Edward Diener<eldiener_at_[hidden]>
>
>> On 9/24/2011 10:31 AM, Lifshitz, Yair wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Object-based persistency/serialization libraries often require significant modifications to the code.
>>> Would Boost consider adding a process-level checkpointing library to boost?
>> Why not explain what you mean by a "process-level checkpointing library"
>> and then others can comment if they might find it useful ?
> Process-level checkpointing is an approach where an entire process' memory image is dumped in binary format.
> The checkpointing library does not require any understanding of the saved application - it works by traversing
> the entire memory image and directly dumping that to disk.
>
> On Linux for example, this can be done by traversing all memory segments described in /proc/self/maps.
>
> This approach is highly robust, and generally considered good for very large applications where
> serialization is a challenge.
>
> Some examples can be seen here - http://checkpointing.org/ - though we had little luck with most of them when
> starting to work on persistency (~6 years ago).
>
I assume resuming from a checkpoint would also require to restore the
registers, flags, stack (pointer), instruction pointer etc. - I'd like
to know if your lib supports only intel or some other architectures too.

Oliver


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk