Re: [boost] Rationale for shared_ptr/array including both ptr to control and ptr to data in class

Subject: Re: [boost] Rationale for shared_ptr/array including both ptr to control and ptr to data in class
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-26 08:42:15

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Mathias Gaunard
<mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Ah. BTW, why doesn't shared_array provide size()?
>> IMO it'd be quite useful to have.
>
> Because it's not storing that information.

So why is it not storing that info?

Olaf