Subject: Re: [boost] Rationale for shared_ptr/array including both ptr to control and ptr to data in class
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-26 08:42:15
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Mathias Gaunard
>> Ah. BTW, why doesn't shared_array provide size()?
>> IMO it'd be quite useful to have.
> Because it's not storing that information.
So why is it not storing that info?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk