Re: [boost] [Review:Algorithms] Boost.Algorithms Review

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review:Algorithms] Boost.Algorithms Review
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-02 18:54:51

Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Sat Oct 01 2011, "Stewart, Robert" <Robert.Stewart-AT-
> sig.com> wrote:
>
> > all.hpp is not the file I'd expect to find any_of or
> > none_of.  I'd prefer to see them moved to any.hpp and
> > none.hpp.
>
> And I'd strongly prefer any_of.hpp and none_of.hpp :-)

If all the algorithms that would be in one header are named with the "any_of" prefix, I agree that it should be any_of.hpp.  I wasn't certain that would be the case, so I was being more general in my suggestion.

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

________________________________

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.