Subject: Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-08 16:46:41
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Since Boost already has BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT and at least one compiler
> (GCC) supports C++11 noexcept, I'd like to start using it in Boost
> So how about a <boost/detail/noexcept.hpp> header with the usual
> boilerplate and this:
> #ifndef BOOST_NO_NOEXCEPT
> # define BOOST_NOEXCEPT
> # define BOOST_NOEXCEPT_IF(Predicate)
> # define BOOST_NOEXCEPT no_except
> # define BOOST_NOEXCEPT_IF(Predicate) no_except(Predicate)
> As was pointed out in a previous thread, there isn't any reliable
> C++03 alternative for either of these two, so nothing is attempted,
> and that's OK in C++03 code.
> We could also define BOOST_NOEXCEPT_OPERATOR(Predicate), and have it
> fall back to true in C++03 code. I'm not expert enough to know if that
> is reliable or even useful, so am not proposing it.
No substantive comments at the moment, I just want to check spelling:
"noexcept" or "no_except"? I had thought it was the former; your macro
definitions suggest the latter.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk