Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?

Subject: Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-10 11:28:48

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>> We could also define BOOST_NOEXCEPT_OPERATOR(Predicate), and have it
>> fall back to true in C++03 code. I'm not expert enough to know if that
>> is reliable or even useful, so am not proposing it.
>
> I think it had better default to false; that would be the conservative
> answer.

Grrr... Double negative confusion strikes again. My mistake. It should
be false. Fixed.

> And the parameter is "Expression," I think.

Yes, that would be better.
>
> I suggest BOOST_IS_NOEXCEPT(Expression)

I settled on BOOST_NOEXCEPT_EXPR(Expression).

Thanks,

--Beman