Subject: Re: [boost] Unittest capability for meta-programs feedback request
From: Ben Robinson (icaretaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-11 02:55:42
I have created a new example to demonstrate BOOST_TBD_METATEST_ASSERT_* in
action. The example is a safe_cast free function which can only be used in
place of static_cast, if there is zero possibility that the value will be
changed upon conversion.
As you can see in examples/safecast/boosttest_safecast.cpp (available at
https://github.com/icaretaker/Metatest), there is a complete set of unit
tests, written for the function, which provide full regression testing for
that function, without requiring a build system that inverts the result of a
failed compile. Here is one such test:
uint8_t unsigned8 = 0;
uint16_t unsigned16 = 0;
uint32_t unsigned32 = 0;
int8_t signed8 = 0;
int16_t signed16 = 0;
int32_t signed32 = 0;
BOOST_CHECK_THROW( unsigned8 = safe_cast<uint8_t>(signed8);,
BOOST_CHECK_THROW( unsigned16 = safe_cast<uint16_t>(signed8);,
BOOST_CHECK_THROW( unsigned32 = safe_cast<uint32_t>(signed8);,
BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW( signed8 = safe_cast<int8_t>(signed8); );
BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW( signed16 = safe_cast<int16_t>(signed8); );
BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW( signed32 = safe_cast<int32_t>(signed8); );
A potential improvement to safe_cast, would be to allow casts from integers
to floating point numbers, provided the number of bits in the mantissa were
sufficient to support the integer. This additional capability can now be
developed which under the full protection of unit tests for the existing
capability, and new unit tests can be written for the new feature.
In the opinion of the Boost community, does this new capability stand on its
own as useful, such that inclusion into Boost would be warranted?
Ben Robinson, Ph.D.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk