Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-14 10:02:58

Krzysztof Czainski wrote:
>
> I program for embedded, and I've beed observing this
> discussion with interest.
>
> +1 for policy based from me. I can imagine using different
> policy StaticVectors in the same app.

For sake of completeness, I'll note that Ion's idea of using a specially recognized allocator to effect the different behaviors in boost::containers::vector is in this vein.  That is, being policy-based doesn't mean it has to be

   static_vector
   <
      class T
      , size_t N
      , class CapacityExhaustionPolicy
   >

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

________________________________

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.