Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-15 19:17:25

Nathan Ridge wrote:

> After reading this thread again, it seems to me that the reason we
> can't reach an agreement is that different people are proposing
> two fundamentally different ways of using static_vector:
> 
>    1) As a variant of [std|boost]::array where not all the elements are
>        constructed/used at the same time, and which keeps track of
>        how many elements are currently in use.

Can you please give some examples of such use?