Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-16 05:21:00
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> In the wider use-cases why isn't "fall back to the heap" the right thing
> to do?
I've no idea. To avoid denial of service, perhaps. Or perhaps the processing
code after that is limited to a specific size anyway for performance
reasons, so it makes no sense to collect more values.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk