Subject: Re: [boost] [c++1] BOOST_NOEXCEPT macros?
From: Domagoj Saric (domagoj.saric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-20 08:56:42
On 19.10.2011. 17:47, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Using (1) on existing code could change behavior.
Again, how could it change behaviour?
Unless, again,: "...there is a real world person/problem that depends on the
defined std::unexpected/std::terminate behaviour of noexcept as opposed to
undefined or implementation defined behaviour of a compiler specific in case
"someone violates a promise given about the particular function"..."
-- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk